Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edwardo E. Millan, Appellant
271 A.D.2d 620707 N.Y.S.2d 842·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2000·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edwardo E. Millan, Appellant.
[707 NYS2d 842]
[MAJORITY]
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered July 3, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Antonio, 255 AD2d 449), and in any event, is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.