General
Hammel, Riglander & Co., Inc. v. United States
2 Cust. Ct. 805·United States Customs Court·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hammel, Riglander & Co., Inc. v. United States
No. 4492.
Invoices dated Strasbourg, France, February 22, 1937, etc.
Certified February 23, 1937, etc.
Entered at New York March 20, 1937, etc.
Entry No. 840953, etc.
(Decided January 12, 1939)
Lane & Wallace for the plaintiff.
Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Ausler, special attorney), for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Sullivan, Judge:]
Sullivan, Judge:
The appeals to reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision by counsel upon a stipulation incorporating the record in United States v. Hammel, Riglander & Co., Inc., Reap. Dec. 4431.
On the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the invoice unit values, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.