Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alabama et al. v. North Carolina, 2011 — 562 U.S. 1176 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Alabama et al. v. North Carolina
562 U.S. 1176·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 132,
Orig.
Alabama et al. v. North Carolina.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of the Special Master for allowance of fees and reimbursement of expenses granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $6,312.50 for the period July 1 through December 31, 2010, to be paid equally by the parties.
Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
[For earlier order herein, see, e. g., supra.]