General
In the Matter of Dolores Anselmo et al., Appellants. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent
85 A.D.2d 938·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1981·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Third Department,
August, 1981
(August 14, 1981)
In the Matter of Dolores Anselmo et al., Appellants. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.
Not published with other decisions of August, 1981, 83 AD2d 910. [Rep.
[MAJORITY]
Motion pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice [22 NYCRR 800.12] for permission to prosecute an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dated January 12, 1979, denied, without costs, and appeal dismissed. Pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice, a motion for permission to prosecute an appeal deemed abandoned must be supported by a showing of reasonable excuse for the delay and facts showing merit to the appeal. Appellants have failed to make such a showing. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Herlihy, JJ., concur.