Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Garrison v. Louisiana, 1964 — 377 U.S. 986 · caselaw · US
General
Garrison v. Louisiana
377 U.S. 986·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 400.
Garrison v. Louisiana.
Eberhard P. Deutsch argued the cause for appellant.
With him on the briefs was René 77. Himel, Jr. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for appellee.
With him on the briefs were M. E. Culligan and John E. Jackson, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Louisiana. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 375 U. S. 900.) Argued April 22,1964. This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.