Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clark Woodard Sprague, Sole Surviving Executor, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob Betz et ux., 1907 — 207 U.S. 579 · caselaw · US
General
Clark Woodard Sprague, Sole Surviving Executor, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob Betz et ux.
207 U.S. 579·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 260.
Clark Woodard Sprague, Sole Surviving Executor, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob Betz et ux.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.
Motion to dismiss submitted October 21, 1907.
Decided October 28, 1907.
Mr. Charles S. Fogg for plaintiff in error. Mr, John F, 8ha}roth for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336; Newburyport Water Company v. Newburyport, 193 U. S. 561; and see Thomas v. Provident Loan and Trust Company, 138 Fed. Rep. 348; S. C., 200 U. S. 618. Case below, 87 Pac. Rep. 916.