Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Agnes E. Coloney, Era L. Abel and Henry F. Abel, by their Guardian ad Litem, Jay C. Coloney, Respondents, v. Edwin Farrow, Appellant, 1900 — 165 N.Y. 615 · caselaw · US
General
Agnes E. Coloney, Era L. Abel and Henry F. Abel, by their Guardian ad Litem, Jay C. Coloney, Respondents, v. Edwin Farrow, Appellant
165 N.Y. 615·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Agnes E. Coloney, Era L. Abel and Henry F. Abel, by their Guardian ad Litem, Jay C. Coloney, Respondents, v. Edwin Farrow, Appellant.
Coloney v. Farrow, 22 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
(Argued November 22, 1900;
decided December 7, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in' the third judicial department, entered November 24, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edgar T. Brackett for appellant.
T. F. Hamilton for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Martin and Vann, JJ. Not voting: Bartlett and Haight, JJ. Not sitting: Landon, J.