MULLINAX v. STATE

(79 South. 143) MULLINAX v. STATE. (7 Div. 539.) (Court of Appeals of Alabama. June 29, 1918.) Criminal Law <&wkey;1094 — Appeal — Matters Review able. Where no bills of exception have been filed, conviction will be affirmed, where no error is apparent in the record. Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; J. E. Blackwood, Judge. Gus Mullinax was convicted for buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, and he appeals. Affirmed. J. S. Franklin, of Gadsden, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State. [MAJORITY — BRICKEN, J.] BRICKEN, J. The defendant was indicted for grand larceny, and for buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, (felony), was convicted for the latter offense, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years. This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty as above, following the verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant, sentencing him to a term of imimprisonment in the penitentiary as provided by law. The certificate of the trial judge shows that the time for filing a bill of exceptions expired, and none has been presented or filed. ■ There is no error apparent in the record; therefore the judgment of conviction is affirmed. ( Affirmed.