Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret Wolf, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick J. Wolf, Deceased, Appellant, v. Manhattan Consumers' Brewing Company, Respondent, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 609 · caselaw · US
General
Margaret Wolf, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick J. Wolf, Deceased, Appellant, v. Manhattan Consumers' Brewing Company, Respondent
184 N.Y. 609·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Wolf, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick J. Wolf, Deceased, Appellant, v. Manhattan Consumers’ Brewing Company, Respondent.
Wolf v. Manhattan Consumers’ Brewing Co., 103 App. Div. 595, affirmed.
(Argued March 29, 1906;
decided April 17, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 30, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
Adolph L. Pineoffs foi appellant.
John Vernon Bowmer, Jr., and Frank V Johnson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.