Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daggs v. Klein, Rear Admiral, U. S. Navy, et al.; and Braito v. Klein, Rear Admiral, U. S. Navy, et al., 1949 — 335 U.S. 908 · caselaw · US
General
Daggs v. Klein, Rear Admiral, U. S. Navy, et al.; and Braito v. Klein, Rear Admiral, U. S. Navy, et al.
335 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 411.
No. 412.
Daggs v. Klein, Rear Admiral, U. S. Navy, et al.; and Braito v. Klein, Rear Admiral, U. S. Navy, et al.
Herbert Res-ner for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney, Oscar H. Davis and John R. Benney for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below:. 169 F. 2d 174.