General
COLGAN v. MEADE
190 F. 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1911
Before PAR-DEE and SIIELBY, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COLGAN v. MEADE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 27, 1911.)
No. 2,146.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas.
George E. Miller and James T. Montgomery, Cor plaintiff In error. Charles K. Bell, for defendant in error.
Before PAR-DEE and SIIELBY, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Under the evidence in (he case, the question whether the survey under which plaintiff in error claimed was actually made on the ground was properly submitted to the jury. The record shows no reversible error, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.