Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gregory Houston HOLT, aka Abdul Maalik Muhammad, petitioner, v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al., 2013 — 134 S. Ct. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Gregory Houston HOLT, aka Abdul Maalik Muhammad, petitioner, v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.
134 S. Ct. 635187 L. Ed. 2d 414·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gregory Houston HOLT, aka Abdul Maalik Muhammad, petitioner,
v.
Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.
No. 13-6827 (13A374).
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 14, 2013.
Application for an injunction submitted to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court granted pending disposition of applicant's petition for writ of certiorari. Respondents are enjoined from enforcing the Arkansas Department of Correction's grooming policy to the extent that it prohibits applicant from growing a one-half-inch beard in accordance with his religious beliefs. If the Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.