Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Seagrove v. Redman et al., 1797 — 4 U.S. 132 · caselaw · US
General
Seagrove v. Redman et al.
4 U.S. 1324 Dall. 132·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1797·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Seagrove v. Redman et al.
Evidence.
A book of original entries (some of which were made in the plaintiff’s handwriting, and some In that of a clerk), relating to a mercantile transaction in a foreign country, produced and sworn to by the plaintiff, was admitted in evidence.
The plaintiff resided in the Havana, and was the agent of the defendants in fitting out a privateer for them, during the war. On the trial of this cause, he produced, and swore to the authenticity of, his book of original entries (some of which were made in his own handwriting, and some in the handwriting of a clerk), to prove the disbursements for the privateer.
s. c. 2 Yeates 254.
[MAJORITY]
And The Court admitted the evidence, after opposition, upon the principle, that as it related to a mercantile transaction, which took place in a foreign country, a relaxation of the strict rules of the common law was reasonable, just and necessary.