Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Fifth National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. The Central National Bank of the City of New York, Appellant, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 636 · caselaw · US
General
The Fifth National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. The Central National Bank of the City of New York, Appellant
152 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Fifth National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. The Central National Bank of the City of New York, Appellant.
Fifth Nat. Bank v. Central Nat. Bank, 82 Hun, 559, affirmed.
(Argued March 2, 1897;
decided March 16, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 22, 1894, which overruled defendant’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at General Term, and directed judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court.
Gibson Putzel for appellant.
W. C. Beecher and R. B. Kelly for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with costs.
All concur.