Admiralty
DALY v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS
265 F. 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1920
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DALY v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 15, 1920.)
No. 139.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Suit in
admiralty by Bartle Daly against the Director General of Railroads, operating the Pennsylvania Railroad. Decree for libelant, and respondent appeals.
Affirmed.
Burlingham, Veedor, Masten & Fearey, of New York City (Chancey I. Clark and Charles E. Wythe, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Macklin, Brown & Purdy, of New York City (-Pierre M. Brown, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before WARD, ROGERS and HOUGH, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.