General
L. C. FRASER, Petitioner, v. L. W. CUMMINGS, as City Clerk, etc., Respondent
48 Cal. App. 797·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1920·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 3521.
First Appellate District, Division Two.
Two.July 14, 1920.]
L. C. ERASER, Petitioner, v. L. W. CUMMINGS, as City Clerk, etc., Respondent.
Elections — Recall—Suehciency oe Petition. — Petition denied and alternative writ discharged on the authority of Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504.
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel a city clerk to certify a recall petition. Petition denied and alternative writ discharged.
This case presents the same issues as those involved in Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504.
De Lancey C. Smith for Petitioner.
H. L. Hagan, City Attorney, and T. J. Ledwieh, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE' COURT.]
THE' COURT.
— The above-entitled cause presents the same issues as those involved in Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504, [192 Pac. 100], and for the reasons therein given the petition is denied and the alternative writ discharged.