General
Champs v. Texas
400 U.S. 954·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Marshall are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 5854.
Champs v. Texas.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 14th Sup. Jud. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question..
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Marshall are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument