Gale George FULLER v. STATE

152 So.2d 696 Gale George FULLER v. STATE. 6 Div. 945. Court of Appeals of Alabama. April 23, 1963. Gale George Fuller, pro se. Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., for the State. [MAJORITY — PRICE, Presiding Judge.] PRICE, Presiding Judge. This appellant has been convicted of robbery and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of twenty years. In the trial court he filed a motion for leave to prosecute an appeal in forma pauperis and requesting that he be furnished with a free transcript of the evidence. The trial judge declined to rule on the motion because it was “insufficient and incomplete.” In Sanders v. State, Court of Appeals 152 So.2d 439, a free transcript was sought. The Montgomery Circuit Court denied the request because the petition does not comply with law; also that Sanders has no meritorious defense. Judge Cates, speaking for this court said: “March 18, 1963, a divided court handed down Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487, 83 S.Ct. 774, 9 L.Ed.2d 899. In view of the possible nugatory effect of this decision upon all or part of our Griffin v. Illinois [351 U.S. 12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891]’ statute (Act No. 62 of Sept. 15, 1961), we remand the cause to the circuit court for further consideration. See Birdsell v. State, 41 Ala.App. 418, 133 So.2d 692. ****** Under the above authorities this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court for further ■consideration. Remanded. “1 Of course, if there are two equally valid constructions of an act, the constitutional one is to be preferred to one clearly contrary to organic law. Here we think doubt should be removed: particularly as to the specification of meritorious errors mentioned in § 7 of Act 62, supra.” Ante, p. 67.