Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Florida Citrus Exposition, Inc., aka Florida Citrus Showcase, Inc. v. Hungerford Construction Co. et al.; and Hungerford Construction Co. et al. v. Florida Citrus Exposition, Inc., aka Florida Citrus Showcase, Inc., 1969 — 396 U.S. 928 · caselaw · US
General
Florida Citrus Exposition, Inc., aka Florida Citrus Showcase, Inc. v. Hungerford Construction Co. et al.; and Hungerford Construction Co. et al. v. Florida Citrus Exposition, Inc., aka Florida Citrus Showcase, Inc.
396 U.S. 928·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 510.
No. 588.
Florida Citrus Exposition, Inc., aka Florida Citrus Showcase, Inc. v. Hungerford Construction Co. et al.; and Hungerford Construction Co. et al. v. Florida Citrus Exposition, Inc., aka Florida Citrus Showcase, Inc.
J. A. McClain, Jr., for petitioner in No. 510 and for respondent in No. 588. Anthony S. Battaglia and Raymond J. Malloy for respondents in No. 510 and for petitioners in No. 588.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 410 F. 2d 1229.