Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Peter K. Knapp et al., Appellants, v. Augusta S. Knapp et al., Respondents, 1883 — 92 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
Peter K. Knapp et al., Appellants, v. Augusta S. Knapp et al., Respondents
92 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Peter K. Knapp et al., Appellants, v. Augusta S. Knapp et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 19, 1883;
decided April 17, 1883.)
John IS. Develin and Theodore F. Jackson for appellants.
John F. Pa/rsons and Edmund Wetmore for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per curiam mem.]
Decided on the opinion of the referee.
Per curiam mem.
for reversal of judgment of General Term of affirmance of judgment on report of referee.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.