Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ella D. George, Appellant, v. Josephine E. Carpenter et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents, 1895 — 147 N.Y. 686 · caselaw · US
General
Ella D. George, Appellant, v. Josephine E. Carpenter et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents
147 N.Y. 686·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ella D. George, Appellant, v. Josephine E. Carpenter et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents.
Reported below, 73 Hun, 331.
(Argued June 7, 1895;
decided October 8, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made the first Monday of October, 1893, which affirmed a judgment entered upon the report of a referee dismissing plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits.
Edward B. Whitney for appellant.
Howard Van Sinderen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, on opinion below, with costs.
All concur.