Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Adele Tillotson Pieris, Respondent, for an Order to Determine the Lien of George William Clune, an Attorney, Appellant, 1903 — 176 N.Y. 566 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Adele Tillotson Pieris, Respondent, for an Order to Determine the Lien of George William Clune, an Attorney, Appellant
176 N.Y. 566·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Adele Tillotson Pieris, Respondent, for an Order to Determine the Lien of George William Clune, an Attorney, Appellant.
Matter of Pieris, 83 App. Div. 466, affirmed.
(Argued October 7, 1903;
decided October 27, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 14, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee appointed in the above-entitled proceeding.
Thomas Abbott McKmnell for appellant.
Francis A. McOlosleey for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.