General
Charlie C. RYALS v. STATE
23 Ala. App. 672119 So. 925·Alabama Court of Appeals·1929·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(119 So. 925)
Charlie C. RYALS v. STATE.
(3 Div. 557.)
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
Jan. 22, 1929.
Powell & Hamilton, of Greenville, for appellant.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — SAMFORD, J.]
SAMFORD, J.
Defendant was convicted on a charge of manufacturing whisky. A careful reading of this record does not disclose a single exception presenting a question of merit. The defendant has had a fair trial. The question of guilt vel non was properly presented to the jury, and, there being no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.