Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Stein v. New York; Cooper v. New York; Wissner v. New York; Cammarata v. Ohio; Cooper v. Peak et al.; Estep et ux. v. Illinois; Patterson v. Saunders et al.; Skovgaard v. United States; Neal v. United States; Davis v. United States; Wismiller v. Estate of Garrett; Pattison et al. v. Union Central Life Insurance Co.; General Motors Corp. et al. v. Ackermans; U. S. A. C. Transport, Inc., also doing business as U. S. Airplane Transport, Inc., v. United States; 24 Digger Merchandising Machines et al. v. United States; Krause et al. v. Bucher, 1953 — 346 U.S. 842 · caselaw · US