General
In the Matter of Timothy Michael FRAZIN, Debtor Timothy Michael Frazin, Appellant v. Haynes & Boone, L.L.P.; Nina Cortell; Warren Dodson; Griffith & Nixon, P.C.; Scott Griffith, Appellees
598 F. App'x 335·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·2015
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Timothy Michael FRAZIN, Debtor Timothy Michael Frazin, Appellant v. Haynes & Boone, L.L.P.; Nina Cortell; Warren Dodson; Griffith & Nixon, P.C.; Scott Griffith, Appellees.
No. 14-10547.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 30, 2015.
Gary N. Schepps, Schepps Law Offices, Dallas, TX, for Appellant.
■ Jeremy Daniel Kernodle Scott William Everett Allen Ryan Paulsen, Esq. Robin Eric Phelan Haynes & Boone, L.L.P. Scott Griffith Jason Lawrence Cagle Anthony Patrick Jach, Esq. Griffith Davison & Shurtleff, P.C. Nicole T. Leboeuf, Esq. Shackelford, Melton & Mckinley, L.L.P. Dallas, TX, for Appellees.
Scott Griffith, Dallas, TX, pro se.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing Timothy Frazin’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim for essentially the reasons. stated by Judge God-bey’s order filed April 16, 2014.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.