General
Henry Gilsey et al., Respondents, v. Albert R. Keen et al., Appellants. Same, Respondents, v. Same, Appellants
185 N.Y. 588·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Gilsey et al., Respondents, v. Albert R. Keen et al., Appellants. Same, Respondents, v. Same, Appellants.
Gilsey v. Keen, 104 App. Div. 427, affirmed.
Gilsey v. Keen, 104 App. Div. 629, affirmed.
(Argued May 23, 1906;
decided June 5, 1906.)
Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of tlie Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in' the first judicial department, entered May 17, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in actions to recover amounts due for rent of leased premises.
Grant C. Fox for appellants.
Sol. Kohn for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment's affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.