General
Hilma Nelson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Richard G. Wood
239 U.S. 637·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 158.
Hilma Nelson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Richard G. Wood.
In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Argued January 11,12,1916.
Decided January 17, 1916.
Mr. A. J. H. Frank for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. R. Stuart Smith and Mr. C. E. Morgan, 3d, for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U. S. 477; McCormick v. Oklahoma City, 236 U. S. 657; S. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R., 237 U. S. 575; Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Publishing Co., 237 U. S. 618.