Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Franklin Bank Note Company, Respondent, v. Charles W. Mackey, Appellant, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 685 · caselaw · US
General
Franklin Bank Note Company, Respondent, v. Charles W. Mackey, Appellant
155 N.Y. 685·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Franklin Bank Note Company, Respondent, v. Charles W. Mackey, Appellant.
Franklin Bank Note Oo. v. Mackey, 88 Hun, 511, affirmed.
(Argued March 17, 1898;
decided April 19, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 26, 1895, sustaining plaintiff’s exceptions, to the direction by the court of a verdict in favor of defendant, ordered to be heard in the first instance at General Term, and granting a new trial.
Eenry L. Bv/mett for appellant.
William J. Gibson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Martin and Vann, JJ., dissenting, and Parker, Oh. J., not sitting.