Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SEA ISLAND THREAD COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent, 1927 — 22 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
SEA ISLAND THREAD COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent
22 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SEA ISLAND THREAD COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 23, 1927.
No. 69.
Petition to Review Order of the Federal Trade Commission
Munn, Anderson & Munn, of New York City (J. K. Brachvogel, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.
E. L. Smith, of Phillipsburg, N. J., and Bayard T. Hainer and Adrien F. Busick, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Walter Gordon Merritt and John W. Simpson, 2d, both of New York City, amici curias.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed in open court,