Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Louisiana et al., 1960 — 364 U.S. 856 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Louisiana et al.
364 U.S. 856·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
The Chief Justice and Mb. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10,
Original,
October Term, 1959.
United States v. Louisiana et al.,
[MAJORITY]
363 U. S. 1. Joint motion of Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana for leave to file supplement to petitions for rehearing granted. Petitions for rehearing denied.
The Chief Justice and Mb. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and application.