Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Peter Weller et al., Respondents, v. Louis Weller et al., Appellants, 1889 — 112 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
Peter Weller et al., Respondents, v. Louis Weller et al., Appellants
112 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Peter Weller et al., Respondents, v. Louis Weller et al., Appellants.
(Argued December 19, 1888;
decided January 15, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made at the March Term, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. (Reported below, 44 Hun, 170.)
Decided substantially upon the opinion below.
Spencer Clinton for appellants.
Truma/n C. White for respondents.
Danfobth, J., reads mem. for affirmance.
[MAJORITY]
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.