Tax
JOHNSON & JOHNSON v. HEROLD, Collector of Internal Revenue for Fifth District of New Jersey
123 F. 409·United States District Court for the District of New Jersey·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JOHNSON & JOHNSON v. HEROLD, Collector of Internal Revenue for Fifth District of New Jersey.
(Circuit Court, D. New Jersey.
May 21, 1903.)
Willard P. Voorhees, for complainants.
David O. Watkins, U..S. Atty., for defendant.
[MAJORITY — ARCHBAED, District Judge.]
ARCHBAED, District Judge.
By agreement of the parties this case was heard by the court without a jury, under the provisions of the statute. The facts are substantially the same as those in the case of Johnson & Johnson v. W. D. Rutan, Collector, 122 Fed. 993. In accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in that case, judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,161.10, being the amount of internal revenue taxes improperly collected by the defendant, with interest from January 1, 1900, to this date.