Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SCHILLER PIANO COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1085 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
SCHILLER PIANO COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
58 F.2d 1085·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SCHILLER PIANO COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 4724.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
June 2, 1932.
Jacob S. Seidman, of New York City, for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, of Washington, D. C., and Dwight H. Green, of Chicago, 111., for respondent.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day comes the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, respondent, by his counsel and presents and files a confession of error in this cause, which said confession of error is in the words and figures following, to wit:
“Comes now the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent in the above entitled cause by and through his attorneys, G. A. Youngquist, Assistant Attorney General,- and C. M. Charest, General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and confesses error in the above entitled cause and consents to the entry of a judgment reversing the decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.
“G. A. Youngquist, “Assistant Attorney General.
“C. M. Charest,
“General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue.”
On consideration whereof it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals entered in this cause on May 23, 1931, be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the said United States Board of Tax Appeals.