General
Etta Eysaman, Respondent, v. Town of Little Falls, Appellant; Marion S. Kruger et al., Appellants, v. Vincent Ciadella et al., Doing Business as Sunrise Motel, Respondents
13 A.D.2d 617·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1961·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(A) Etta Eysaman, Respondent, v. Town of Little Falls, Appellant. (B) Marion S. Kruger et al., Appellants, v. Vincent Ciadella et al., Doing Business as Sunrise Motel, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
[In each action] Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.