General
Dennis L. NESS and John E. Bowders, Petitioners v. YORK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent
96 A.3d 986·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·2014·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dennis L. NESS and John E. Bowders, Petitioners v. YORK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 8, 2014.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court commit an error of law when it determined that a Section 108 post-enactment notice, which was facially deficient, served as a shield against Petitionerfs’] claim that the underlying Zoning and SALDO Ordinances were defective and rendered moot all procedural challenges regarding the adoption of the ordinances?
The matter will be submitted on briefs.