Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret DICKSON, et al., petitioners, v. Robert RUCHO, et al., 2017 — 137 S. Ct. 2186 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Margaret DICKSON, et al., petitioners, v. Robert RUCHO, et al.
137 S. Ct. 2186198 L. Ed. 2d 252·Supreme Court of the United States·2017
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret DICKSON, et al., petitioners,
v.
Robert RUCHO, et al.
No. 16-24.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 30, 2017.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1455, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2017).