General
Julius Rogak, Respondent, v. David Lantinberg and Wigly Candy Co., Inc., Appellants
240 A.D. 735·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Rogak, Respondent, v. David Lantinberg and Wigly Candy Co., Inc., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.