Contracts · MBE-tested
LAIKIND v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK
397 U.S. 148·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LAIKIND v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK
No. 68.
Decided March 2, 1970
Victor Konow for appellant.
Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Warren M. Goidel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final judgment.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.