Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
State of MONTANA, plaintiff, v. State of WYOMING and State of North Dakota., 2015 — 136 S. Ct. 289 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
State of MONTANA, plaintiff, v. State of WYOMING and State of North Dakota.
136 S. Ct. 289193 L. Ed. 2d 17·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
State of MONTANA, plaintiff,
v.
State of WYOMING and State of North Dakota.
No. 137, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 5, 2015.
Motion of Montana to defer consideration of this case and the Exceptions to the Special Master's Second Interim Report filed December 29, 2014, for the period of three months granted. Parties are ordered to submit a joint status report to the Court no later than December 31, 2015.