Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Catherine E. Pawling, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents, v. William M. Pawling et al., Appellants, 1896 — 150 N.Y. 574 · caselaw · US
General
Catherine E. Pawling, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents, v. William M. Pawling et al., Appellants
150 N.Y. 574·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine E. Pawling, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents, v. William M. Pawling et al., Appellants.
(Argued October 7, 1896 ;
decided October 27, 1896.)
Penciling v. Pawling, 86 Hun, 502, affirmed.
Appeal' from judgment of the General Term - of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 17, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the. court on trial-at Special Term.
Edward P. White for appellants.
Z. S. Westbrook for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.