Contracts · MBE-tested
WAGGONER et al. v. ROSENN, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF PENNSYLVANIA
394 U.S. 846·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WAGGONER et al. v. ROSENN, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 144,
Misc.
Decided May 5, 1969.
William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edgar B. Casper, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion of appellants for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania for further consideration in light of Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 618.