Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Carthel J. HODGES, Sr. v. Mary Ann HODGES
298 Ark. 550771 S.W.2d 741·Arkansas Supreme Court·1989·AR
Hickman, J., not participating.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Carthel J. HODGES, Sr. v. Mary Ann HODGES
89-122
771 S.W.2d 741
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered May 1, 1989
Herrods of Arkansas, P.A., by: E.H. “Buz” Herrod, for petitioner.
Steve Clark, Att’y Gen., by: Paul Cherry, Asst. Att’y Gen., for respondent Pulaski County Chancery Court, Second Division.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
We deny the petitioner’s request for a writ of prohibition, but we do so because the record and orders presented to us are unclear. In denying such relief, we in no way intend to give validity to the standing master order entered below, but assume that any issue addressing that point would be presented to us along with any other in any appeal.
Hickman, J., not participating.