Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Powell et al., Receivers, v. Maryland Trust Co., Successor Trustee; and New York Trust Co., Surviving Trustee, v. Maryland Trust Co., Successor Trustee, 1942 — 316 U.S. 671 · caselaw · US
General
Powell et al., Receivers, v. Maryland Trust Co., Successor Trustee; and New York Trust Co., Surviving Trustee, v. Maryland Trust Co., Successor Trustee
316 U.S. 671·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1021.
No. 1075.
Powell et al., Receivers, v. Maryland Trust Co., Successor Trustee; and New York Trust Co., Surviving Trustee, v. Maryland Trust Co., Successor Trustee.
April 27, 1942.
Messrs. W. R. C. Cocke and Harold J. Gallagher for petitioners in No. 1021. Messrs. George M. Fanning and Irwin F. Tappen for petitioner in No. 1075. Messrs. Edward Duffy and Carlyle Barton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.