Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LEV v. UNITED STATES, 1959 — 360 U.S. 470 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
LEV v. UNITED STATES
360 U.S. 4703 L. Ed. 2d 1531·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LEV v. UNITED STATES.
No. 435.
Argued April 27-28, 1959.
Decided June 22, 1959.
Anthony Bradley Eben argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 435.
Albert H. Treiman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 436.
John T. Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner in No. 437. On the brief was Isidor Enselman.
Oscar H. Davis argued the causes for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg, Julia P. Cooper and Jerome M. Feit.
Together with No. 436, Wool v. United States, and No. 437, Rubin v. United States, also on certiorari to the same Court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.