Contracts · MBE-tested
Everett KNAUS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
64 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Everett KNAUS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos. 6626, 6627.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 15, .1933.
L. P. Donovan, of Shelby, Mont., and Molumby, Busha & Greenan and Slattery & Tighe, all of Great Falls, Mont., for appellant.
Wellington D. Rankin, U. S. Atty., and Arthur P. Acher and Sam D. Goza, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Helena, Mont.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the record and briefs, filed in above causes, and after oral argument of counsel for the respective parties, ordered order of District Court in ease No. 6626, and judgment of District Court in case No. 6627, affirmed, judgments of affirmance be filed and entered, and mandates issued as provided for by rule 32.