Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Newspaper Drivers & Handlers Local Union No. 372, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Inc. v. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Assn. et al., 1969 — 395 U.S. 923 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Newspaper Drivers & Handlers Local Union No. 372, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Inc. v. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Assn. et al.
395 U.S. 923·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1267.
Newspaper Drivers & Handlers Local Union No. 372, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Inc. v. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Assn. et al.
David Previant and David L. Uelmen for petitioner.
Philip T. Van Zile II and Daniel J. Tin-dall, Jr., for Detroit Newspaper Publishers Assn., and Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher for National Labor Relations Board, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.