Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Czarnikow, MacDougall & Co. (Limited), Plaintiff in Error, v. George R. Bidwell, Collector, etc., 1903 — 191 U.S. 559 · caselaw · US
General
Czarnikow, MacDougall & Co. (Limited), Plaintiff in Error, v. George R. Bidwell, Collector, etc.
191 U.S. 559·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
(The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr, Justice Brewer and Mr. Justice Peckham dissent.)
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 14.
Czarnikow, MacDougall & Co. (Limited), Plaintiff in Error, v. George R. Bidwell, Collector, etc.
Submitted December 4, 1903.
Decided December 14, 1903.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244, 287.
(The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr, Justice Brewer and Mr. Justice Peckham dissent.)
Mr. Frederic B. Coudert, Jr., Mr. Paul Puller and Mr. Henry M. Ward for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for defendant in error.