Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. W. H. Tucker, Guardian, etc., 1909 — 214 U.S. 532 · caselaw · US
General
The Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. W. H. Tucker, Guardian, etc.
214 U.S. 532·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 347.
The Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. W. H. Tucker, Guardian, etc.
In error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas.
May 3, 1909.
Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. W. L. Hall for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Theodore Mack for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Jiidg-. ment reversed with costs upon confession of error and request of defendant in error, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law and justice.