Corporations
Queensboro Improvement Company, Respondent, v. William Dean and Others, Defendants, and Emma Groomer, Abbie Thompson, Marcella Whitehead, Rebecca Johnson, Carrie Mitchell and Main Elder Corporation, Appellants
260 A.D. 868·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1940·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Queensboro Improvement Company, Respondent, v. William Dean and Others, Defendants, and Emma Groomer, Abbie Thompson, Marcella Whitehead, Rebecca Johnson, Carrie Mitchell and Main Elder Corporation, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order denying the motion of appellants to dismiss the amended complaint, made pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that it fails to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 865.]