General
Schofield, Receiver, v. Folsom
168 U.S. 706·Supreme Court of the United States·1897
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 111.
Schofield, Receiver, v. Folsom.
Error to the Supreme Court.of the Territory of New Mexico.
Argued November 9, 1897.
Decided November 15, 1897.
Mr. W. B. Childers for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Neill B. Field and Mr. Franlc W. Clancy for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Gregory Consolidated Mining Company v. Starr, 141 U. S. 222.